Firefox 42will not allow the installation of unsigned extensions

Mozilla Firefox logoMozilla has announced that, starting with Firefox 42, the installation of unsigned extensions will be not allowed anymore, due to security-related concerns.

Signed extensions are Firefox add-ons that have been checked and approved by Mozilla's automated extensions verification system, or by one of its human reviewers.

They were announced back in February, but no timeline was offered on how and when Mozilla wanted to implement them.

The Mozilla wiki did reveal that, starting with the recently released Firefox 40, users would get a warning whenever installing an unsigned extension, and that with Firefox 41, unsigned extensions would only be installed if a special option in the about:config page was enabled.

New details have now surfaced, the same wiki page revealing that, starting with the beta versions of Firefox 42, users won't be able to install an unsigned extension at all.

According to the blog post from February, this move was caused by the increasing number of developers that are abusing Mozilla's add-on installation procedures, overwriting user preferences, changing homepages, and even redirecting users to malware.

"We’re responsible for our add-ons ecosystem and we can’t sit idle as our users suffer due to bad add-ons," said Jorge Villalobos, Add-ons Developer Relations Lead for Mozilla.

This is why the company is introducing a system similar to what Google uses for its Chrome extensions, but unlike the Chrome team, it is not forcing extensions to be distributed only through its add-ons website.

Extension developers will still be able to host their extensions wherever they want, and have them signed by Mozilla's team.

Firefox 42will not allow the installation of unsigned extensions

According to Mozilla's new procedures, developers still have the option of hosting their add-ons on the Mozilla website or on their own sites. This hasn't changed.

What has changed is that, before an extension is signed, developers have to create a Mozilla account if they don't have one, submit the extension and have it reviewed by an automatic system.

If this automatic system encounters errors, developers can ask for a manual review carried out by a Mozilla employee.

After the extension is approved and signed, the developer can then publish it on the Mozilla add-ons page, or keep their profile hidden and distribute it via their own website.

Developers who work with private extensions distributed only in closed Intranets will also have a special method for signing their extensions, but no official details have been released on this procedure yet.

Regarding older extensions already submitted and listed to the Mozilla add-ons repository, the company started signing them a while back, even the ones abandoned by their developers.

Source: Softpedia

Tags: browsers, Firefox, Mozilla

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Joyce#10 0
Thumbs up to you!!1Its amazing..i aptriceape yourwork, but it has certain problems, mainly the bandwidth!!!In YOUR FREEDOM site its given that for a free account, the max. bandwidth is 64 Kbit/s (Kilo bits/second), i.e. actually, just 6.4KB/s(Kilo Bytes/second). Airtel, if we connect in 2g itself, we can get an average of 10KB/s. I believe that you can find a better solution for this, even if its in 3g or 2g, with a free account, we get a max speed of 5.0KB/s, which does not have a great influence in todays need.But off course its worth at the time we don have an activated Data pack.Anyways Kudos!!!!
Reply 
Joyce#20 0
Thumbs up to you!!1Its amazing..i aptriceape yourwork, but it has certain problems, mainly the bandwidth!!!In YOUR FREEDOM site its given that for a free account, the max. bandwidth is 64 Kbit/s (Kilo bits/second), i.e. actually, just 6.4KB/s(Kilo Bytes/second). Airtel, if we connect in 2g itself, we can get an average of 10KB/s. I believe that you can find a better solution for this, even if its in 3g or 2g, with a free account, we get a max speed of 5.0KB/s, which does not have a great influence in todays need.But off course its worth at the time we don have an activated Data pack.Anyways Kudos!!!!
Reply 
Joyce#30 0
Thumbs up to you!!1Its amazing..i aptriceape yourwork, but it has certain problems, mainly the bandwidth!!!In YOUR FREEDOM site its given that for a free account, the max. bandwidth is 64 Kbit/s (Kilo bits/second), i.e. actually, just 6.4KB/s(Kilo Bytes/second). Airtel, if we connect in 2g itself, we can get an average of 10KB/s. I believe that you can find a better solution for this, even if its in 3g or 2g, with a free account, we get a max speed of 5.0KB/s, which does not have a great influence in todays need.But off course its worth at the time we don have an activated Data pack.Anyways Kudos!!!!
Reply 

Last news

 
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1180 will be Turing-based with a 12nm FinFET die shrink
 
This only works on posts made by profiles that are public
 
 
The device will be standalone and based on a Qualcomm chipset
 
Apple plans on offering a cheaper smart speaker that will be priced at $199
 
Chrome will adopt a new approach to indicating site security
 
Data shows they are leading smartphone sale worldwide
 
Is this an error or it is really happening?
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (10)