Google extends right-to-be-forgotten rules to all search sites

Google logoGoogle has responded to European Union data watchdogs by expanding its right-to-be-forgotten rules to apply to its search websites across the globe.

In 2014, search engines were ordered by Europe's top court to scrub certain listings on their indexes. Google—which commands roughly 90 percent of the search market in the EU—claimed at the time that such measures amounted to censorship of the Internet.

However, the landmark European Court of Justice ruling in fact stated that search engines were required to remove links that are old, out of date or irrelevant, and—most significantly of all—not found to be in the public interest.

Indeed, the right-to-be-forgotten may seem evocative to privacy campaigners, but as the UK's Information Commissioner's Office has previously stated, "there is no absolute right [under the ruling] to have information removed."

Google, meanwhile, decided to play the long game by only agreeing to jettison some links from its EU-based search sites, immediately following the judgment. So it applied those rules to Google.co.uk, and Google.de, for example, but not to Google.com.

Now, Google's right-to-be-forgotten policy has changed following pressure from data protection authorities in Europe.

The multinational said that it would use geolocation signals (such as IP addresses) to restrict access to delisted URLs on all of Google's search domains. Mountain View's global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer, explained the move in a blog post on Friday:

So for example, let’s say we delist a URL as a result of a request from John Smith in the United Kingdom. Users in the UK would not see the URL in search results for queries containing [john smith] when searching on any Google Search domain, including google.com.

 

Users outside of the UK could see the URL in search results when they search for [john smith] on any non-European Google Search domain.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Google, search

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
This restriction will extend to existing extensions over the remainder of the year
 
Apple would switch that end from USB-A over to USB-C
 
NVIDIA and AMD will soon have another graphics competitor
 
App Store Guidelines Apple is a ban on developers building their own databases with collected contact info
 
New update, new problems for iPhone owners
 
The social network will ban businesses with bad customer service and repeated negative reviews from advertising
 
Microsoft is hoping to define a new form factor as it once did with Surface Pro
 
Microsoft has not mentioned a specific date
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (10)