Almost half of leading websites fail security and privacy tests

Almost half of leading websites fail security and privacy testsIn an audit of 1,000 websites, including those of leading retailers, banks, social media, news and government bodies, 46 percent were found vulnerable to known online security threats.

According to the non-profit Online Trust Alliance, which conducted the study, sites belonging to Internet of Things companies are most at risk. The audit included the websites of 50 leading Internet of Things device makers, focused on wearable technologies and connected home products. 76 percent of these sites failed the assessment, while only 20 percent scored highly enough to qualify for the OTA's Online Trust Honor Roll.

Craig Spiezle, Executive Director and President of OTA says, "The results of this audit serve as a wake-up call to Internet of Things companies who are handling highly sensitive, dynamic and personal data. In rushing their products to market without first addressing critical data management and privacy practices, they are putting consumers at risk and inviting regulatory oversight".

The OTA evaluates websites based on dozens of criteria in three categories: consumer protection, privacy and security. While 46 percent of audited websites failed outright, another 10 percent didn't perform strongly enough to earn the OTA's Honor Roll status. This is an improvement, however, with 44 percent qualifying for Honor Roll status compared to only 30 percent in 2014.

Among sites that scored well, Twitter topped the overall ratings for the third year running. Top banking site was the USAA Federal Savings Bank and top government site the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The retail sector saw the largest increase in Honor Roll qualification, up from just 24 percent of evaluated websites in 2014 to 42 percent in 2015.

"Our audit and Honor Roll program rewards companies for a commitment to data stewardship, security and privacy policies that protect against cybercrime’s escalating threats," says Spiezle. "OTA commends the companies whose dedication to responsible data practices earned them a place on our list. At the same time, it is concerning to see others remain complacent, failing to embrace responsible practices year after year".

Source: Betanews

Tags: security

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Purported leak reveals upcoming phablet’s design
 
Google boasts of integration with Google Assistant and Google Home
 
The support team replied that some hardware limitations are leading to malfunctions
 
The retailer will allow results to appear in the Shopping section of Google’s search engine
 
Trump is seeking to lift the export ban as a "personal favor" to China
 
The company reportedly sniffed around AMD and Nvidia as potential GPU suppliers
 
 
iPhone users in the US will be able to automatically share their location with first responders
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (10)