Dropbox clarifies its policy on reviewing shared files for DMCA issues

Dropbox logoFor years now, Internet users have accepted the risk of files and content they share through various online services being subject to takedown requests based on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and/or content-matching algorithms. But users have also gotten used to treating services like Dropbox as their own private, cloud-based file storage and sharing systems, facilitating direct person-to-person file transfer without having to worry.

This weekend, though, a small corner of the Internet exploded with concern that Dropbox was going too far, actually scanning users' private and directly peer-shared files for potential copyright issues. What's actually going on is a little more complicated than that, but it shows that sharing a file on Dropbox isn't always the same as sharing that file directly from your hard drive over something like e-mail or instant messenger.

The whole kerfuffle started yesterday evening, when one Darrell Whitelaw tweeted a picture of an error he received when trying to share a link to a Dropbox file via IM. The Dropbox webpage warned him and his friend that "certain files in this folder can't be shared due to a takedown request in accordance with the DMCA."

Whitelaw freely admits that the content he was sharing was a copyrighted video, but he still expressed surprise that Dropbox was apparently watching what he shared for copyright issues. "I treat [Dropbox] like my hard drive," he tweeted. "This shows it's not private, nor mine, even though I pay for it."

In response to follow-up questions from Ars, Whitelaw said the link he sent to his friend via IM was technically a public link and theoretically could have been shared more widely than the simple IM between friends. That said, he noted that the DMCA notice appeared on the Dropbox webpage "immediately" after the link was generated, suggesting that Dropbox was automatically checking shared files somehow to see if they were copyrighted material rather than waiting for a specific DMCA takedown request.

Dropbox did confirm to Ars that it checks publicly shared file links against hashes of other files that have been previously subject to successful DMCA requests. "We sometimes receive DMCA notices to remove links on copyright grounds," the company said in a statement provided to Ars. "When we receive these, we process them according to the law and disable the identified link. We have an automated system that then prevents other users from sharing the identical material using another Dropbox link. This is done by comparing file hashes."

Dropbox added that this comparison happens when a public link to your file is created and that "we don't look at the files in your private folders and are committed to keeping your stuff safe." The company wouldn't comment publicly on whether the same content-matching algorithm was run on files shared directly with other Dropbox users via the service's account-to-account sharing functions, but the wording of the statement suggests that this system only applies to publicly shared links.

We should be clear here that Dropbox hasn't removed the file from Whitelaw's account; they just closed off the option for him to share that file with others. In a tweeted response to Whitelaw, Dropbox Support said that "content removed under DMCA only affects share-links." Dropbox explains its copyright policy on a Help Center page that lays out the boilerplate: "you do not have the right to share files unless you own the copyright in them or have been given permission by the copyright owner to share them." The Help Center then directs users to its DMCA policy page.

Dropbox has also been making use of file hashing algorithms for a while now as a means of de-duplicating identical files stored across different users' accounts. That means that if I try to upload an identical copy of a 20GB movie file that has already been stored in someone else's Dropbox account, the service will simply give my account access to a version of that same file rather than allowing me to upload an identical version. This not only saves bandwidth on the user's end but significant storage space on Dropbox's end as well.

Some researchers have warned of security and privacy concerns based on these de-duplication efforts in the past, but the open source Dropship project attempted to bend the feature to users' advantage. By making use of the file hashing system, Dropship effectively tried to trick Dropbox into granting access to files on Dropbox's servers that the user didn't actually have access to. Dropbox has taken pains to stop this kind of "fake" file sharing through its service.

In any case, it seems a similar hashing effort is in place to make it easier for Dropbox to proactively check files shared through its servers for similarity to content previously blocked by a DMCA request. In this it's not too different from services like YouTube, which uses a robust ContentID system to automatically identify copyrighted material as soon as it's uploaded.

In this, both Dropbox and YouTube are simply responding to the legal environment they find themselves in. The DMCA requires companies that run sharing services to take reasonable measures to make sure that re-posting of copyrighted content doesn't occur after a legitimate DMCA notice has been issued. Whitelaw himself doesn't blame the service for taking these proactive steps, in fact. "This isn't a Dropbox problem," he told Ars via tweet. "They're just following the laws laid out for them. Was just surprised to see it."

Still, we feel this is important information for Dropbox users to know. There are certain limitations on how accounts can be used. Any Dropbox file shared via a "public link," even if it's a link that you only intend to share with a single person, is being compared against a database of previous material subject to the DMCA. It could be blocked on those grounds.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Dropbox

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Mehdi#10 0
March 20, 2012 at 15:14</a>I'm currently in a riitalonshep with a sagitarious woman. Most stated above is relatively true, though they fail to mention both the Virgo's and the sagitarious's utter inability to figure out what they both trully desire emotionally. For instance, my partner was talking to an ex of hers throughout the begginning stages of our ralationship, as was I. The thing is, through all of their differences, their's an undeniable hope for a riitalonshep, a real riitalonshep. Not one of those fairytale riitalonsheps where both parties live happily ever after without need for argument, but a riitalonshep where disagreement and conflict is faced and neutralized, rather than ignored. The only conflicting aspect between the two is the constant presense of fear. Fear is an ugly feeling in which I despise greatly. Fear is obsolete in my opinion, but there's not a day that goes by that I'm not in fear of her future. Given the kind of person a sagitarious is, they'll ignore all resposibilities and principals for the sake of having a good time with a vast and scattered group of (what they consider) true friends . Thus allowing themselves to be walked all over .just as the virgo, who gives oneself entirely to anyone in desprate need only to be met by a demeanor of utter indiference. So how could we discredit this riitalonshep entirely based on a rocky start, when in reality, the two sign are both capable of extraordinary potentials for wholeness that compliment one another quite well.Everybody's insecure. I blame the media and stalkers aren't nearly as creepy since the invention of facebook.This riitalonshep is actually perfect in it's own justified way. It's a rough one, but if both parties are completely open to one another and refuse to allow any room for suspicion, then the possibilities for happiness are trully endless. That is up until someone dies .of course. Reply</a>
Reply 
Mehdi#20 0
March 20, 2012 at 15:14</a>I'm currently in a riitalonshep with a sagitarious woman. Most stated above is relatively true, though they fail to mention both the Virgo's and the sagitarious's utter inability to figure out what they both trully desire emotionally. For instance, my partner was talking to an ex of hers throughout the begginning stages of our ralationship, as was I. The thing is, through all of their differences, their's an undeniable hope for a riitalonshep, a real riitalonshep. Not one of those fairytale riitalonsheps where both parties live happily ever after without need for argument, but a riitalonshep where disagreement and conflict is faced and neutralized, rather than ignored. The only conflicting aspect between the two is the constant presense of fear. Fear is an ugly feeling in which I despise greatly. Fear is obsolete in my opinion, but there's not a day that goes by that I'm not in fear of her future. Given the kind of person a sagitarious is, they'll ignore all resposibilities and principals for the sake of having a good time with a vast and scattered group of (what they consider) true friends . Thus allowing themselves to be walked all over .just as the virgo, who gives oneself entirely to anyone in desprate need only to be met by a demeanor of utter indiference. So how could we discredit this riitalonshep entirely based on a rocky start, when in reality, the two sign are both capable of extraordinary potentials for wholeness that compliment one another quite well.Everybody's insecure. I blame the media and stalkers aren't nearly as creepy since the invention of facebook.This riitalonshep is actually perfect in it's own justified way. It's a rough one, but if both parties are completely open to one another and refuse to allow any room for suspicion, then the possibilities for happiness are trully endless. That is up until someone dies .of course. Reply</a>
Reply 
Mehdi#30 0
March 20, 2012 at 15:14</a>I'm currently in a riitalonshep with a sagitarious woman. Most stated above is relatively true, though they fail to mention both the Virgo's and the sagitarious's utter inability to figure out what they both trully desire emotionally. For instance, my partner was talking to an ex of hers throughout the begginning stages of our ralationship, as was I. The thing is, through all of their differences, their's an undeniable hope for a riitalonshep, a real riitalonshep. Not one of those fairytale riitalonsheps where both parties live happily ever after without need for argument, but a riitalonshep where disagreement and conflict is faced and neutralized, rather than ignored. The only conflicting aspect between the two is the constant presense of fear. Fear is an ugly feeling in which I despise greatly. Fear is obsolete in my opinion, but there's not a day that goes by that I'm not in fear of her future. Given the kind of person a sagitarious is, they'll ignore all resposibilities and principals for the sake of having a good time with a vast and scattered group of (what they consider) true friends . Thus allowing themselves to be walked all over .just as the virgo, who gives oneself entirely to anyone in desprate need only to be met by a demeanor of utter indiference. So how could we discredit this riitalonshep entirely based on a rocky start, when in reality, the two sign are both capable of extraordinary potentials for wholeness that compliment one another quite well.Everybody's insecure. I blame the media and stalkers aren't nearly as creepy since the invention of facebook.This riitalonshep is actually perfect in it's own justified way. It's a rough one, but if both parties are completely open to one another and refuse to allow any room for suspicion, then the possibilities for happiness are trully endless. That is up until someone dies .of course. Reply</a>
Reply 
Helen#40 0
March 29, 2012 at 21:34</a>Dante auch: Love your response to Sag/virgo<a href="http://rkvmno.com"> rpeitionshals</a>! I am a Sag woman first fiance was a Virgo man. It didn't work due to my fears I broke it off 1.5 months from the wedding. Well life goes on! I am now married to a Gemini man and completely & totally unhappy. I began an affair with my best friend of 17 years YES you guessed it, a Virgo man. It for all intents and purposes is perfect if you didn't factor in that we both are married, he is in the Army & just got deployed to Korea. All I can say is life is so complicated. You can never judge or ever think you understand anyone! I have come to conclusion that a perfect relationship doesn't exist ONLY IN THE MOVIES! But good luck because Sags are TRUE optimists!!! Reply</a>
Reply 
Helen#50 0
March 29, 2012 at 21:34</a>Dante auch: Love your response to Sag/virgo<a href="http://rkvmno.com"> rpeitionshals</a>! I am a Sag woman first fiance was a Virgo man. It didn't work due to my fears I broke it off 1.5 months from the wedding. Well life goes on! I am now married to a Gemini man and completely & totally unhappy. I began an affair with my best friend of 17 years YES you guessed it, a Virgo man. It for all intents and purposes is perfect if you didn't factor in that we both are married, he is in the Army & just got deployed to Korea. All I can say is life is so complicated. You can never judge or ever think you understand anyone! I have come to conclusion that a perfect relationship doesn't exist ONLY IN THE MOVIES! But good luck because Sags are TRUE optimists!!! Reply</a>
Reply 
Helen#60 0
March 29, 2012 at 21:34</a>Dante auch: Love your response to Sag/virgo<a href="http://rkvmno.com"> rpeitionshals</a>! I am a Sag woman first fiance was a Virgo man. It didn't work due to my fears I broke it off 1.5 months from the wedding. Well life goes on! I am now married to a Gemini man and completely & totally unhappy. I began an affair with my best friend of 17 years YES you guessed it, a Virgo man. It for all intents and purposes is perfect if you didn't factor in that we both are married, he is in the Army & just got deployed to Korea. All I can say is life is so complicated. You can never judge or ever think you understand anyone! I have come to conclusion that a perfect relationship doesn't exist ONLY IN THE MOVIES! But good luck because Sags are TRUE optimists!!! Reply</a>
Reply 
Flavio#70 0
best relationship i ever had was virgo to virgo. we did argue quite a bit, but it was never heetad arguments, and we enjoyed them. we supported each-other well and were brutally honest we are both still in love, but i pushed her away.. post traumatic stress changed me, and i had issues that made me feel she was safer without me, so i moved on. broke both our harts., but its all i could see to do to pout her in a position that someone who was more capable of being the person she deserved. i gave up my true love even though it meant hurting her so she could find a more proper guy for herself and be happy. so now i'm happy she found happiness even though she was the one http://fkgizws.com [url=http://qfgoojh.com]qfgoojh[/url] yzsvsw
Reply 
Flavio#80 0
best relationship i ever had was virgo to virgo. we did argue quite a bit, but it was never heetad arguments, and we enjoyed them. we supported each-other well and were brutally honest we are both still in love, but i pushed her away.. post traumatic stress changed me, and i had issues that made me feel she was safer without me, so i moved on. broke both our harts., but its all i could see to do to pout her in a position that someone who was more capable of being the person she deserved. i gave up my true love even though it meant hurting her so she could find a more proper guy for herself and be happy. so now i'm happy she found happiness even though she was the one http://fkgizws.com [url=http://qfgoojh.com]qfgoojh[/url] yzsvsw
Reply 
Flavio#90 0
best relationship i ever had was virgo to virgo. we did argue quite a bit, but it was never heetad arguments, and we enjoyed them. we supported each-other well and were brutally honest we are both still in love, but i pushed her away.. post traumatic stress changed me, and i had issues that made me feel she was safer without me, so i moved on. broke both our harts., but its all i could see to do to pout her in a position that someone who was more capable of being the person she deserved. i gave up my true love even though it meant hurting her so she could find a more proper guy for herself and be happy. so now i'm happy she found happiness even though she was the one http://fkgizws.com [url=http://qfgoojh.com]qfgoojh[/url] yzsvsw
Reply 

Last news

 
Consumer group recommends iPhone 8 over anniversary model
 
LTE connections wherever you go and instant waking should come to regular PCs, too
 
That fiction is slowly becoming a reality
 
The Snapdragon 845 octa-core SoC includes the Snapdragon X20 LTE modem
 
Human moderators can help make YouTube a safer place for everyone
 
Google says Progressive Web Apps are the future of app-like webpages
 
All 2018 models to sport the 'notch'
 
The biggest exchange in South Korea, where the BTC/KRW pair is at $14,700 now
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)