Atom can't feed fab monster; Intel outsources chips to TSMC

Intel logoMonday morning's announcement that Intel will outsource the production of some of its Atom processors to TSMC is roughly the semiconductor equivalent of the recent cancellation of the newspaper editors' national convention, or of the closing of major dailies like the Rocky Mountain News.

The late winter storm now pounding the northeast US isn't the only freak weather event currently in progress. Hell itself has frozen over, and the proof is that, for the first time in history, Intel is partially outsourcing the fabrication of one of its CPUs to a foundry.

Intel and TSMC have jointly announced the start of a long-term, "strategic" collaboration in which Atom IP will be ported to TSMC's manufacturing process, with the Taiwanese foundry fabricating Atoms for some customers.

"It is a long-term collaboration. It is not about capacity. It's a strategic relationship that allows us to expand the growth opportunities for both companies," said an Intel spokesperson on a call announcing the venture. "This relationship between us and TSMC is strategic in nature; it's the first time we've ported a processor externally outside of an Intel process."

Both parties are being deliberately vague on the timing and the process node at which this will start, stressing that the current announcement is just about the "memorandum of understanding" (MOU) that they've signed. (The press release is similarly vague.) News of specific plans and products will follow much later, once the details have been worked out.

Intel's Sean Maloney set out to give the company's official explanation for the move by touting Intel's recent announcements of investments in 32nm and stressing that Intel still sees itself as a manufacturing company. He then jumped to the non-sequitur that the TSMC agreement will allow Intel to "attack new markets" and offer "post-recession products."

In response to questions, Maloney stressed that the existing Atom roadmap is unchanged, and that the TSMC relationship was not about replacing Intel's existing fab capacity, but about new markets. "We're doing it because it enables us to get access to a market that we can't do alone," Maloney said. "This doesn't replace what we're doing already, or what they're doing already. It's additive to what we're currently doing."

Intel totally failed to explain why its massive new investments in 32nm, not to mention its current 45nm plants and substantial legacy fab capacity, aren't just as amenable to "attacking new markets" as outsourced fab capacity. But while Intel can't possibly admit this, the reason is as clear as day: Atom is just too cheap to support Intel's legacy business model, which is about funding expensive new fabs on the backs of high-margin sales of existing, high-performance processors.

Source: ars technica

Tags: Atom, CPUs, Intel, netbooks, TSMC

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
You can use a security key instead of having a code sent to your phone
 
Adobe says that the AI can now achieve the intended result in seconds
 
A new security protocol replacing the aging WPA2
 
Download and install at your own risk, of course
 
More iPhone parts likely to be produced by Samsung
 
Starting on Friday, video views on YouTube will start to be counted by the Official Charts Company
 
LG has already announced two new V-series members in 2018
 
The method is blocked and the hack doesn’t work, it adds
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (11)