Intels Itanium server CPUs shuffle one step closer to the grave

Intel logoWhen last we heard about Intel's Itanium server CPUs, it sounded like Intel was planning a slow, controlled slide into obsolescence for the processors and their accompanying architecture. Kittson, an Itanium revision due in 2015 or so, would be socket-compatible with the company's more popular Xeon CPUs, removing the need for (and, crucially, the R&D costs of) Itanium-specific motherboards and chipsets. Now, Intel appears to be backing down from even those modest plansPC World has just noticed an Intel posting from late January, saying that Kittson would remain socket-compatible with the current Itanium 9300 and 9500 CPUs.

Sticking a new processor in an older motherboard can still yield speed improvements, but you'll miss out on new, chipset-dependent advancementssupport for faster RAM, newer RAM standards (like the upcoming DDR4), and new versions of PCI Express, SATA, and USB, among other thngs. Intel's decision to keep future Itanium revisions on today's chipsets will make it easier to upgrade existing systems, but it won't do much to sell new ones. Intel will also keep Kittson CPUs on its 32nm manufacturing process rather than moving to the more energy efficient 22nm process it uses for its Ivy Bridge CPUs, reflecting a further reluctance to continue investing in the architecture. By the time Kittson ships, this process will be even further behind the curve than it is now.

While Intel told PC World that using the same motherboard and chipsets for Itanium and Xeon "will be evaluated for future implementation opportunities," this is just the latest sign that Itanium is on Intel's back burnerMicrosoft's server software no longer supports the architecture and a lawsuit from HP is the only thing keeping Oracle's database software for Itanium alive. Intel introduced the Itanium chips in 2001 as a way for servers to move to 64-bit operating systems that could handle more than 4GB of RAM while also fighting off competing RISC architectures, but the Itanium instruction set didn't maintain backward-compatibility with existing x86 software. In 2003, AMD introduced its first Opteron server CPUs, which implemented 64-bit instructions while maintaining 32-bit compatibility; Intel eventually licensed these instructions for use in its own chips, and Itanium has been in a long, slow decline ever since.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: CPUs, Intel, Itanium

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
The smartphone could come with a 4,200mAh battery
 
New iTunes backup password verification system exists in parallel to the much stronger, older iOS 9 system
 
 
ARM's new Bifrost architecture, which focuses on high-end 4K and VR experiences
 
Apples 2017 iPhone could employ the use of Samsungs Flexible OLED Atomic Layer Deposition Technology
 
Redmond not willing to pay so much for Twitter
 
Foxconn and Pegatron will both be behind the production
 
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
HP Slate 7 is a 7-inch Android 4 Tablet PC with good sound
A cost-effective, 7-inch tablet PC from a renowned manufacturer
October 25, 2013 / 4
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments