Haswell-EP will follow Ivy Bridge-EP with 14 Cores and 4-Channel DDR4

Intel logoThere is now information on not only the next-generation high-end EP platform, but also on the processor range that will debut after it. All thanks to the Intel Developer Forum.

These three days have been filled with announcements from Intel and the participants at its IDF San Francisco 2012 event, as well as attempts on AMD's part, and that of others, to distract people from that trade show.

We doubt we'll find any sort of “counter-announcement” to the info that the folks at VR-Zone claim uncovered.

The Intel Ivy Bridge-EP processor platform, scheduled for 2013, will succeed the Sandy Bridge-EP that, even now, hasn't been fully released.

That was something we already knew, just like we knew that a 15-core Ivy Bridge EX CPU (Xeon E7 4800 V2) will debut around the middle of 2013, compatible with socket 2011.

What we didn't know was that the “Haswell-EX” Xeon E7 4800 / 800 v3 will arrive in 2014 and will offer 16 to 20 cores. Afterwards, “Broadwell EX” Xeon E7 4800 / 8800 v4 will arrive, in 2015, with even more cores.

In the meanwhile, the existing 8-core Sandy Bridge EP Xeon E5 2600 / 4600 will pass the torch to a 10-core 3.2+ GHz Ivy Bridge EP Xeon E5 2600 / 4600 v2 (2014). Again, a different pin-out will be used, but the same dimensions as socket 2011.

After that, the 2015-bound Haswell EP Xeon E5 2600 / 4600 v3 will possess 14 cores, 4-channel DDR4-2133 memory support, quad-QPI links (9.6 GT/s), the works.

What we find curious is the progressive rise in core count. Although we admit that software can only get better at multi-thread performance, we can't help but feel that the rate of adding cores to CPUs, even high-end ones, is a bit fast.

There is also the matter of convenience: if Haswell-EP, with its power efficiency benefits (foreshadowed by 7-10W Haswell CPUs), can operate at TDPs of 145W (server) and 160W (workstation), adding the extra cores makes more sense than not using the space. It helps that the L3 cache (2.5 MB per core) can stay the same even under these conditions.

Source: Softpedia

Tags: CPUs, Intel, servers

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Google’s voice assistant platform has been known as Google Now
 
The SanDisk 1TB SD card prototype represents another significant achievement as growth of high-resolution content
 
Microsoft is developing a new “Skype for Life” client
 
Siri on the Mac is new, and is similar to that on the iOS
 
The latency in this test was supposedly no more than 2 milliseconds
 
Apple has made to the iPhone 7/7 Plus is by making the home button a solid state button
 
Android Nougat should eventually extend back to the Galaxy S6 generation
 
You’re not supposed to expose the iPhone to water anyway
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
HP Slate 7 is a 7-inch Android 4 Tablet PC with good sound
A cost-effective, 7-inch tablet PC from a renowned manufacturer
October 25, 2013 / 4
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 




Poll

Do you like Windows 10?
or leave your own version in comments (32)