Intels Xeon Phi barely equals AMDs VLIW Radeons

Intel logoIntels work on the Larabee project and succeeding Xeon Phi accelerator cards has cost the company billions of dollars and lasted for almost a decade. Now, the architecture is finally ready to fight for a place on the GPU compute market.

During this years Hot Chips conference in Cupertino, California, the worlds largest semiconductor company shared the final details on the Xeon Phi cards and it seems the it achieved a lot for a first-generation product.

On the other hand, not all is rosy for Intel and its Xeon Phi project.

Intels problem is best described by its own slides during the presentation, as the company is actually now comparing its new and very advanced architecture with last years technology from AMD and Nvidia and still cant show any impressive results.

It is widely known that AMDs VLIW architecture was quite handicapped when it came to GPU compute work and Nvidias 2090 accelerators, while being considerably better, were launched a year ago.

Even so, these are the only examples Intel has found in the famous Top500 list of supercomputers that could allow it to present its new Xeon Phi cards in an acceptable light.

Intels Xeon Phi barely equals AMDs VLIW Radeons

Intels performance per watt improvement measures just 0.7% when compared with a server using VLIW AMD cards and 9% when compared with a server using Nvidias Tesla 2090 cards.

Were quite surprised AMD has the better solution when it comes to GPU compute and performance per watt, especially because were talking about a VLIW design but, overall, Intels Xeon Phi is quite disappointing.

Despite the company having a much better manufacturing technology, as the Xeon Phi chips are made using 22nm transistors and the worlds best software optimization and compiler support, the results are only comparable with AMDs and Nvidias last years tech.

Source: Softpedia

Tags: CPUs, GPU, Intel

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
 
Highlights of the new feature update include a tweaked interface with Fluent Design elements
 
Its now open to third-party developers and designed for smart home devices
 
Prices start at $1499 for the 13.5-inch model and $2499 for the 15-inch model
 
Users claim the Start menu isnt working after the upgrade
 
It will release its first all-purpose AI chips by the end of 2017
 
Android 8.1 Oreo arriving on Pixel phones "in the coming weeks"
 
The Snapdragon 636 also comes with support for modern ultra-wide FHD+ displays
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)