Intel's new 34nm SSDs cut prices by 60 percent, boost speed

Intel logoIntel has launched two new SSDs based on its leading-edge 34nm process. But these SSDs are cheaper and faster, not bigger, and in this respect they're a good fit for today's market.

Intel has announced two new solid state disk drives made on its leading-edge 34nm process. The two new SSDs are X25M SATA parts weighing in at 80GB and 160GB, and they're meant to replace Intel's existing X25M drives in those capacities, but at 60 percent less cost and with better performance. The 80GB X25-M is $225 in lots of 1,000 (down from $595), and the 160GB is $440 (from $945). That's some serious discounting, and it may well drive even more SSD uptake in the coming quarters despite the ongoing IT spending crunch.

Intel X25M

o what do you get for 60 percent less? In a word, speed. The new drives boast a 25 percent reduction in read latency, which was already about 60x the speed of an average hard disk; write performance has also doubled with this new generation.

Incidentally, the yawning gap between SSD performance and HDD performance is behind the push to SSD-specific interfaces on I/O hubs now, like with Intel's upcoming Pine Trail platform. The bottlenecks are really at the system level, and possibly in the OS, as well. Aside from some halfway steps like Intel Turbo Memory, there hasn't really been a major rethinking of PC system architecture that starts with the presumption of a very fast, large pool of nonvolatile storage (e.g., SSD) that sits behind main memory. There may have to be even more SSD adoption before such a rethink can become feasible, though.

Noticeably absent from the announcement is a high-capacity 320GB drive, which many were expecting. So why did Intel choose to hold off on pushing the SSD capacity envelope and instead produce drives that are direct replacements for existing 50nm products? Like most things nowadays, the answer has to do with the economy.

A 320GB drive would be an expensive, premium product of the sort that nobody is buying right now—not tapped-out consumers, and not cash-strapped IT departments. So instead of trying to sell a high-end SSD, Intel took advantage of Moore's Law to massively cut the cost of making its existing flash products, so that it could lower the price and sell more of them into a price-sensitive market. Intel could even be making a bit more profit on each drive even while passing considerable savings on to customers.

It's also the case that the 34nm transition was in the works well before the financial crisis, and would have been in the latter stages of coming online when Intel's revenues fell off a cliff in the last quarter of 2008. So Intel has gone ahead and brought that capacity online, and they're going to use it to make what everyone wants right now, i.e., cheaper storage that, as an added bonus, also performs a bit better.

Source: arstechnica

Tags: Intel, SSD

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
The 41 million Galaxy S8/S8+ units that the company reported it has shipped in 2017
 
A new survey from Loup Ventures finds Apple iPhone users are falling into a predictable upgrade cycle
 
 
The company might do away with the Android Wear moniker in favor of “Wear OS”
 
But still no third-party Lightning to USB-C cables
 
Jolla confirmed Sailfish OS will now be supported by another Sony smartphone
 
A complete line of accessories will be available of $1,899.99
 
The Snapdragon 700 Series will allow you to capture content during the day and night
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (9)