Samsung recorded its own bend test to prove the Galaxy S6's strength

Samsung logoIt really might've been better if Samsung had just ignored SquareTrade bending, deforming, and ultimately destroying its latest flagship smartphone. But that's not what's happening. In response to the bend test published last week, Samsung has replied with a blog post slamming SquareTrade for putting the S6 Edge under an enormous amount of weight that the company says "rarely occurs under normal circumstances." Samsung says its internal figures have found that the force typically generated when a person "presses the back pocket," whatever that means, is around 66lbf.

"Our internal test results indicate that the Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge are not bendable even under 79lbf, which is equivalent to putting pressure to snap a bundle of five pencils at once," Samsung said in its blog post. And yes, you'll see those pencils broken in half in the company's own bend test video. "It isn't easy to break four pencils at once. Breaking five is even harder," the video astutely points out. In the clip, Samsung subjects the S6 to the force that it specified, though never goes far enough to permanently bend or destroy its own smartphone.

Samsung: Galaxy S6 Edge не гнется

Samsung is also apparently displeased that SquareTrade only tested the S6 Edge with the screen facing up. "Some smartphones have different durability in each the front and back sides respectively," the company wrote. "SquareTrade has only tested the front side, which may mislead consumers about the entire durability of smartphones." So, in addition to posting its own rebuttal and bend video, Samsung has formally asked SquareTrade to run its test again — this time on both sides of the phone — and make those results public.

Like Apple, Samsung has apparently felt the need to promptly refute a test we've already said shouldn't give potential S6 buyers the slightest bit of pause. It's even throwing out the same terms like "normal everyday use." Will SquareTrade's do-over end with a more favorable outcome? Maybe. But that'll also keep this non-story in the headlines. Perhaps the better strategy would've been to shrug it off while going on to sell millions and millions of phones.

Source: The Verge

Tags: Galaxy S6, Samsung, smartphones

Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
Your comment:

Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party

Last news

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1180 will be Turing-based with a 12nm FinFET die shrink
This only works on posts made by profiles that are public
The device will be standalone and based on a Qualcomm chipset
Apple plans on offering a cheaper smart speaker that will be priced at $199
Chrome will adopt a new approach to indicating site security
Data shows they are leading smartphone sale worldwide
Is this an error or it is really happening?
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /

News Archive



Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (10)