Psystar scores a small victory against Apple

Psystar logoPsystar shows no intent to surrender in its legal battle with Apple and the companys persistence was recently rewarded with a small victory that allows the company to claim that Apple misused Mac OS X copyrights.

Psystars success may prove to be insignificant, but a new court order shows that Apples Mac OS X copyright claims may not be as innocent and untouchable as they seem. In fact, this small victory may provide a hook for Psystar to build a case.

Psystars original antitrust claims against Apple were dismissed last November. In an amended complaint, Psystar said Apple has improperly leveraged its Mac OS copyrights in order to gain exclusive rights with respect to Mac OS-compatible computer hardware systems not granted in the Mac OS copyrights and unfair competitive behavior resulting from the misuse of copyrights.

Within the eight-page ruling (PDF download, courtesy of justia.com), the court repeats Psystars allegations that Apple has wrongfully extended the scope of its Mac OS copyright via its End User License Agreement and that Apple is leveraging its Mac OS copyrights by improperly asserting claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Psystar alleges, in effect, that Apple is improperly extending its Mac OS copyright into the computer hardware market by intimidating potential competitors into avoiding the market with dubious DMCA claims, the court wrote.

Psystar then asked the court for a declaratory judgment that Apples Mac OS copyrights are unenforceable, based on the claim of copyright misuse, Apples use or threat of DMCA claims, a possible violation of Californias unfair competition laws.

Within this latest ruling, the court sided with Psystar on the copyright misuse claims, since Apple did not provide any reasons to bar the claims at the pleading stage. However, the court rejected Psystars claims targeting a violation of unfair competition laws. In the view of the court, Psystar fails to explain [] how this conduct constitutes harm to competition or a violation of the spirit of the antitrust laws.

In the context of single-firm conduct, tying requires monopolization. Psystar has identified none - other than the limited monopolies inherent in the copyrights themselves, the court explained.

Source: TG Daily

Tags: Apple, Mac OS X

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Consumer group recommends iPhone 8 over anniversary model
 
LTE connections wherever you go and instant waking should come to regular PCs, too
 
That fiction is slowly becoming a reality
 
The Snapdragon 845 octa-core SoC includes the Snapdragon X20 LTE modem
 
Human moderators can help make YouTube a safer place for everyone
 
Google says Progressive Web Apps are the future of app-like webpages
 
All 2018 models to sport the 'notch'
 
The biggest exchange in South Korea, where the BTC/KRW pair is at $14,700 now
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)