European Commission investigating Samsung, Apple patent fight

European Commission investigating Samsung, Apple patent fightThe European Commission has confirmed that it's making antitrust inquiries with both Apple and Samsung in relation to their ongoing patent battle. The Commission itself declined to make further comment on the issue aside from stating that "requests for information are standard procedure in antitrust investigations," though Apple's legal filings in the US have indicated that the investigation is over Samsung's alleged abuse of "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) licensing agreements.

The Commission's investigation was first reported by FOSS Patents on Thursday, which highlighted the paragraph within Apple's US filings that pointed to the probe. "Samsung has sued Apple for infringement and injunctions in no fewer than eight countries outside the United States," Apple wrote. "Indeed, Samsung's litigation campaign and other conduct related to its Declared-Essential Patents is so egregious that the European Commission recently has opened an investigation to determine whether Samsung's behavior violates EU competition laws."

The EC followed up with a brief public statement on Friday, not directly acknowledging the purpose of its investigation, but confirming that one was indeed in progress. "The Commission has indeed sent requests for information to Apple and Samsung concerning the enforcement of standards-essential patents in the mobile telephony sector. Such requests for information are standard procedure in antitrust investigations to allow the Commission to establish the relevant facts in a case. We have no other comments at this stage," the Commission said.

We have discussed how Samsung's strategy of suing Apple over the company's use of 3G technologies might backfire. The 3G patents in question are typically licensed under FRAND agreements, wherein standards-setting organizations agree to use patented technologies from companies involved in the standards-setting process under "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" terms. Samsung claims that other manufacturers have licensed these patents while Apple has not, but Apple claims that Samsung never made any offer to license the patents to Apple on FRAND or any other terms.

The EU doesn't generally look kindly upon suing over FRAND-encumbered patents, so it's no surprise that the EC is now looking into the situation. And given Steve Jobs' strong conviction on fighting what Apple sees as rip-offs of its own designs, we don't expect Apple to back down anytime soon when it comes to defending itself against Samsung.

Source: Ars Technica

Tags: Apple, EU, legal action, Samsung

Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
Your comment:

Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party

Last news

Pokemon GO had the potential to net $1 billion a year
The report said that Hon Hai has invested about US$600 million in India
Market research firm IDC reports that in the third quarter of this year
Customers will only have to shell out 50% of the cost of their Galaxy S7 device
New flagship will launch in 2017
Patent hints at name of the upcoming Surface AIO
IBM, Globalfoundries and Samsung have chosen to use extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light to pattern transistors
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
HP Slate 7 is a 7-inch Android 4 Tablet PC with good sound
A cost-effective, 7-inch tablet PC from a renowned manufacturer
October 25, 2013 / 4

News Archive



Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments