Google forced to give Viacom video logs, but can keep search source code

Logo GoogleViacom won a significant victory in their $1 billion copyright infringement case against Google/YouTube. Google has been ordered to hand over terabytes of video search information that shows the details of every video ever played on YouTube. However Google did dodge a huge bullet as Judge Louis Stanton denied Viacom??™s request for source code to Google??™s search engine.

Viacom says it wanted the video logs to prove whether copyright-protected videos were more heavily watched than amateur clips. Viacom attorneys offered to provide Google hard drives to store the 12 terabytes of data. While the logs will be sanitized to protect real names and email addresses, they will still include the time a video is played, the login id and the IP address.

Google??™s attorneys tried to block the request on privacy grounds, but Stanton argued that IP addresses aren??™t accurate enough to provide the true identity of the video viewer. Google has also been ordered to provide copies off all videos that have ever been removed from YouTube.

Viacom contends Google??™s YouTube infringes on its works on a massive scale and that the online video site isn??™t just providing storage space for the videos. The company contends that YouTube commits ???duplication, distribution and public display??? when a video is watch. Furthermore, Viacom attorneys insist that the video is copied to the computer (in cache) after it is played, something which perpetuates the piracy.

But while Google was forced to give up video logs, the judge denied Viacom??™s request for Google??™s and YouTube??™s search engine source code. Google claimed the code represented 1000 man years of development time and said divulging the code would be risking the loss of Google??™s core business. Viacom countered by saying it wanted to prove that Google manipulated the code to treat copyrighted material differently, but Judge Stanton didn??™t buy that argument.

Viacom also wanted Google??™s advertising schema database which contains all the advertising companies and amounts charged for ads within YouTube. This request was also denied by Judge Stanton because he didn??™t think it was relevant to the case.

Source: TG Daily

Tags: Google, YouTube

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Consumer group recommends iPhone 8 over anniversary model
 
LTE connections wherever you go and instant waking should come to regular PCs, too
 
That fiction is slowly becoming a reality
 
The Snapdragon 845 octa-core SoC includes the Snapdragon X20 LTE modem
 
Human moderators can help make YouTube a safer place for everyone
 
Google says Progressive Web Apps are the future of app-like webpages
 
All 2018 models to sport the 'notch'
 
The biggest exchange in South Korea, where the BTC/KRW pair is at $14,700 now
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)