Intel settles FTC antitrust suit, stops punishing AMD buyers

Intel logoThe antitrust suit brought by the Federal Trade Commission against Intel last December may be at an end, with the parties having reached a tentative settlement agreement.

The suit against Intel alleged that the company had illegally stifled competition in the processor market. Specifically, it said that the chip maker threatened PC makers (including Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and IBM) who wanted to source processors from AMD, then rewarded them for remaining loyal to Intel. The settlement prohibits Intel from making such threats and offering rewards in return for exclusivity—the company can no longer punish PC makers for buying processors from AMD.

The settlement also imposes four specific restrictions on Intel in order to ensure that markets remain competitive. First, Intel must alter its intellectual property licensing agreements with AMD, NVIDIA, and Via, to allow those companies greater freedom to collaborate or merge without risking a suit from Intel for patent infringement. This should prevent replays of the squabble between AMD and Intel when AMD divested itself of its manufacturing facilities, a move arguably in breach of the licensing terms between the two companies.

Second, Intel must extend its x86 license agreement with Via for another five years beyond the expiration of its current agreement, which is set to expire in 2013.

Third, Intel must retain the use of the PCI Express interface for at least six years, such that GPUs can be used without suffering any performance limit. The intent is to ensure that companies like NVIDIA still have a reason to produce GPUs targeted at Intel-based systems, even when those Intel systems contain integrated GPUs.

Finally, Intel must inform software developers that its compiler discriminates between Intel and non-Intel CPUs, and that it produces code that may not use all the features of those non-Intel CPUs. The company will also have to reimburse any developer who wants to compile their software using a non-Intel compiler.

Preventing total market dominance

The settlement is designed to ensure not just that the CPU market remains competitive, but also that the GPU market continues to remain that way. Intel is already the dominant maker of GPUs, courtesy of its widespread integrated GPUs. With the latest generation of processors including a GPU in the CPU package, and the next generation set to include it on the CPU die, this domination is likely to continue.

The growth of integrated GPUs poses a particular problem for NVIDIA. The GPU company has no license for the DMI and QPI buses used on Intel's current processors, which prevents it from being able to make replacement chipsets. This is one of the reasons why Apple stuck with an older, FSB-based processor for the 13" MacBook Pro. NVIDIA's only option for the new processors is to produce discrete PCI Express devices.

This is itself an imperfect solution; the PCI Express bus makes low-power, low-cost GPUs that share system memory impractical, which is detrimental to NVIDIA's Ion platform. But at least PCI Express does give the company some options.

Intel might have been tempted to ditch PCI Express completely, at least on some of its processors and chipsets; for many Atom machines, the combination of USB and SATA is good enough, making PCI Express superfluous. The settlement agreement means that the company will have to retain the interface—at least for the next six years—ensuring that NVIDIA always has some ability to provide GPUs for Intel systems, even if it is not as extensive as NVIDIA might like.

The FTC said that, though the new agreement goes beyond the terms and restrictions imposed after previous Intel suits, it will nonetheless leave Intel room to continue to innovate and compete. The settlement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, at which point the Commission will decide whether to make it final.

Source: ars technica

Tags: AMD, Intel

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Consumer group recommends iPhone 8 over anniversary model
 
LTE connections wherever you go and instant waking should come to regular PCs, too
 
That fiction is slowly becoming a reality
 
The Snapdragon 845 octa-core SoC includes the Snapdragon X20 LTE modem
 
Human moderators can help make YouTube a safer place for everyone
 
Google says Progressive Web Apps are the future of app-like webpages
 
All 2018 models to sport the 'notch'
 
The biggest exchange in South Korea, where the BTC/KRW pair is at $14,700 now
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)