Google paid Apple $1B to be default iOS search bar provider in 2014

Google logoIn a public transcript of ongoing court proceedings, an Oracle lawyer is quoted as saying Google paid out the funds as part of a revenue sharing agreement with Apple, reports Bloomberg. Terms of the contract are unclear, but Google apparently handed over a percentage of revenue generated through iOS device searches.

Today's report confirms years of speculation concerning the benefits Apple reaps by allowing Google to process — and glean data from — iOS searches. In 2013 it was estimated that Apple takes in more than $1 billion from Google search referrals, though neither company has commented officially on those numbers.

Oracle's attorney, Annette Hurst, noted in court last week that an unnamed Google witness interviewed during pretrial proceedings said, "at one point in time the revenue share was 34 percent." Bloomberg was unable to gather whether the percentage reflects the share Google keeps or pays to Apple.

Google lawyers attempted to strike Hurst's statements regarding the 34 percent amount from the official record, but was rebuffed by presiding Judge William Alsup. A subsequent filing requested the transcript be sealed and redacted as the information could prove detrimental in negotiating terms with other companies. Apple made a separate filing asking the same.

The revelation contrasts Apple CEO Tim Cook's stance on privacy. The Apple chief has on many occasions decried companies — Google — that monetize personal data, including information gathered from Web searches.

Google paid Apple $1B to be default iOS search bar provider in 2014

"You might like these so-called free services, but we don't think they're worth having your email, your search history and now even your family photos data mined and sold off for God knows what advertising purpose," Cook said at the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Champions of Freedom event event last year. "And we think some day, customers will see this for what it is."

For its part, Apple does not market, support or implement products that gather sensitive user data. Current iterations of iOS apps and services like Maps, Health and the embattled iAd platform transport and store user information, but that data is protected and for the most part anonymized. Importantly, Apple does not monetize its customer base.

Oracle is suing Google for allegedly using unlicensed Java software to build the Android operating system.

Source: AppleInsider

Tags: Google, iOS, search

Comments
Add comment

Your name:
Sign in with:
or
Your comment:


Enter code:

E-mail (not required)
E-mail will not be disclosed to the third party


Last news

 
Consumer group recommends iPhone 8 over anniversary model
 
LTE connections wherever you go and instant waking should come to regular PCs, too
 
That fiction is slowly becoming a reality
 
The Snapdragon 845 octa-core SoC includes the Snapdragon X20 LTE modem
 
Human moderators can help make YouTube a safer place for everyone
 
Google says Progressive Web Apps are the future of app-like webpages
 
All 2018 models to sport the 'notch'
 
The biggest exchange in South Korea, where the BTC/KRW pair is at $14,700 now
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) Review
The evolution of the successful smartphone, now with a waterproof body and USB Type-C
February 7, 2017 /
Samsung Galaxy TabPro S - a tablet with the Windows-keyboard
The first Windows-tablet with the 12-inch display Super AMOLED
June 7, 2016 /
Keyboards for iOS
Ten iOS keyboards review
July 18, 2015 /
Samsung E1200 Mobile Phone Review
A cheap phone with a good screen
March 8, 2015 / 4
Creative Sound Blaster Z sound card review
Good sound for those who are not satisfied with the onboard solution
September 25, 2014 / 2
Samsung Galaxy Gear: Smartwatch at High Price
The first smartwatch from Samsung - almost a smartphone with a small body
December 19, 2013 /
 
 

News Archive

 
 
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      




Poll

Do you use microSD card with your phone?
or leave your own version in comments (4)